Co-Teaching Workshop

The purpose of the “Co-Teaching for Innovation in Appalachian” workshop is to learn how to use teacher candidates to develop innovative strategies for improving student learning in K-12 classrooms. A primary outcome of the workshop will be the development of projects that can be used as exemplars for other mentor teachers. This workshop is sponsored by an Ohio University 1804 grant.

For examples of these projects, please see the sections below. There you will find examples of co-teaching approaches. Each of these was designed by a mentor teacher in Southeastern Ohio and implemented with a professional intern.

One Teach, One Observe

One of the advantages in co-teaching is that more detailed observation of students engaged in the learning process can occur. With this approach, for example, co-teachers can decide in advance what types of specific observational information to gather during instruction and can agree on a system for gathering the data. Afterward, the teachers should analyze the information together. The teachers should take turns teaching and gathering data, rather than assuming that the special educator is the only person who should observe.

Examples: One Teach, One Observe

One Teach, one Assist

In a final approach to co-teaching, one person would keep primary responsibility for teaching while the other professional circulated through the room providing unobtrusive assistance to students as needed. This should be the least often employed co-teaching approach.

Examples: One Teach, One Assist

Alternative Teaching

In most class groups, occasions arise in which several students need specialized attention. In alternative teaching, one teacher takes responsibility for the large group while the other works with a smaller group. These smaller groups could be used for remediation, pre-teaching, to help students who have been absent catch up on key instruction, assessment, and so on.

Examples: Overview, Teacher Lesson, Student Lesson, Science

Parallel Teaching

On occasion, students’ learning would be greatly facilitated if they just had more supervision by the teacher or more opportunity to respond. In parallel teaching, the teachers are both teaching the same information, but they do so to a divided class group. Parallel also may be used to vary learning experiences, for example, by providing manipulatives to one group but not the other or by having the groups read about the same topic but at different levels of difficulty.

Examples: Approach 1, Approach 2

Station Teaching

In this co-teaching approach, teachers divide content and students. Each teacher then teaches the content to one group and subsequently repeats the instruction for the other group. If appropriate, a third “station” could give students an opportunity to work independently. As co-teachers become comfortable with their partnership, they may add groups or otherwise create variations of this model.

Examples: Station Teaching

Team Teaching

In teaming, both teachers share delivery of the same instruction to a whole student group. Some teachers refer to this as having “one brain in two bodies.” Others call it “tag team teaching.” Most co-teachers consider this approach the most complex but satisfying way to co-teach, but it is the approach that is most dependent on teachers’ styles.

Examples: Team 1, Team 2, Team 3

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s